Media coverage
ARA en español · 2025-10-19
The article argues that the Gaza ceasefire is fragile and lacks both a shared political horizon and guarantees to sustain it, despite Donald Trump’s claims of a new “golden era” of peace. It outlines six threats hanging over the truce: continued killings after the ceasefire began, disputes over the return of bodies, the continued Israeli military presence in large parts of Gaza, restrictions on humanitarian aid, Hamas’s rejection of disarmament, and the absence of an agreed plan for who will govern the Strip.
The article argues that the Gaza ceasefire is fragile and lacks both a shared political horizon and guarantees to sustain it, despite Donald Trump’s claims of a new “golden era” of peace. It outlines six threats hanging over the truce: continued killings after the ceasefire began, disputes over the…
## The agreement has no shared political horizon or guarantees to sustain it
Special correspondent in JerusalemDonald Trump is a master at manufacturing headlines even when they do not conform to the truth. This week he has proclaimed that the Middle East has entered a new golden era of peace thanks to his mediation for a ceasefire in Gaza. But the reality is very far from this. After two years of devastation, the only thing that exists is a fragile truce: Trump has convinced Netanyahu to halt the bombings and Hamas to hand over the hostages. Trump has turned the diplomatic machinery upside down. Normally agreements are forged through hours and hours of meetings among advisers to discuss the details behind closed doors until finding a basis for understanding, which is then ultimately certified with the signatures of the political leaders. But in this case everything has gone in reverse: the leaders initialed an agreement in a ceremony in the Egyptian city of Sharm el-Sheikh that merely staged international support for the US initiative. A ceremony at which the protagonists were not present: neither Hamas nor Netanyahu, and both have made clear that there is no common political basis for moving forward.
Read it all
As the Palestinian analyst Omar Shaban, founder of the Gaza-based center Pal-Think for Strategic Studies, recalls, the current situation "is not a political solution, but rather a pause imposed by exhaustion and international pressure." A European representative involved in the negotiations told the Reuters news agency that "it is a truce of survival, not of reconciliation." Below we review the threats hanging over the ceasefire.
## Will peace come to Gaza?
The wartime mindset has still not been broken, despite the halt in the bombings: according to the official count, Israel has killed 34 Palestinians in Gaza since the start of the ceasefire — among them seven minors, two women and two men from the same family — leaving 122 wounded. Israel accuses Hamas of violating the agreement by maintaining armed positions and active tunnels, while the Islamist movement denounces that Israel is carrying out selective military operations. Israeli military sources, cited by the newspaper Haaretz, admit that the truce "does not imply the end of operations," but rather a "strategic reorganization to prepare the next scenario." Trump has proclaimed the end of the war, but Netanyahu has not.
## Will the exchange get bogged down over the bodies?
Hamas has returned the 20 living hostages it had held since October 7, 2023, but it has handed over only the bodies of 10 of the 28 hostages who died that day or during captivity in Gaza. The Islamists had already said they were not in a position to do so, and it had been agreed that international forensic teams would go to the Strip to help locate them, but Israel nonetheless considered it a violation of the ceasefire. "If Hamas does not manage to return all the bodies, or if Israeli society perceives that it is not doing everything possible to return them, the already fragile trust between the parties will be further eroded and the implementation of the next stages of the agreement will become more complicated," warns Danny Citrinowicz, a former member of Israeli military intelligence.
Israel has not fulfilled its side either regarding the return of the bodies of Palestinians who have died in captivity in its prisons. It has returned 135 corpses, many of them bearing marks of torture or signs of having been executed while alive. Many of them were not identified despite having remained detained in prisons for months or years. In addition, the prisoners most popular among Palestinians and who could play a political role, such as Marwan Barghouti, have not been released.
## Will Israel withdraw its troops from Gaza?
Israeli troops have withdrawn to the yellow line defined by Trump’s plan and still occupy 53% of the territory of the Gaza Strip, which is no larger than the Maresme. The plan gives Israel leeway to maintain a military presence in Gaza to ensure that Hamas cannot reconstitute itself. Israeli security sources insist that it is necessary to maintain control of strategic areas, such as the Philadelphi Corridor, on the border with Egypt.
As Daniel E. Mouton, a researcher at the Scowcroft Middle East Security Initiative, recalls, the far-right partners in Netanyahu’s government oppose any withdrawal. In his view, the agreement represents only "a reduction of fire, not a total ceasefire." Official Israeli sources admit that the troops "will continue inside Gaza" and that the most realistic projection is a partial and tactical redeployment, maintaining control of the corridors and border areas.
## Will enough humanitarian aid enter Gaza?
The population of Gaza is living through a devastating humanitarian crisis, with hunger caused by the Israeli siege, the healthcare system destroyed, successive forced displacements, and basic infrastructure such as water purification plants and the electricity grid razed by the bombings. And all of this on the eve of the third winter since the start of the war. The latest ceasefire agreement allowed the entry of food, but not shelter materials. Thousands of wounded people must be evacuated to be treated in other countries, and heavy machinery is needed to reopen the roads and remove the rubble. Israel controls how many trucks can enter the Strip and by which routes, especially the corridor that runs from Rafah to the Kerem Shalom crossing. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced this Saturday that the Rafah border crossing will remain closed until Hamas fulfills its part of the agreement to return the bodies of the deceased Israeli hostages.
## Will Hamas disarm?
The Palestinian militia has signed the agreement under heavy pressure from its regional allies (Turkey and Qatar) and has already expressed its opposition to disarming, arguing that it will only hand over its weapons to a future Palestinian state. The plan provides for the deployment of an international armed force to guarantee security, but this has not been specified (the big question is which country is willing to send soldiers to Gaza), and it is also unclear in whose hands the government of the Strip will remain: the Islamists have accepted a Palestinian technocratic government, while Trump is betting on a colonial government led by himself and the colonial government led by himself Palestinian state, which Netanyahu is not willing to accept in any way: in fact, he prides himself on being the Israeli leader who has made it impossible.
## Who Will Govern Gaza?
Neither Israel, nor Hamas, nor the Palestinian Authority have a plan for the day after the war. Israel demands the complete destruction of Hamas before negotiating a permanent truce. Hamas demands the total withdrawal of the troops and recognition of the Palestinian right to self-determination. The Palestinian Authority, weakened and delegitimized, watches from a distance.
As former Palestinian negotiator Hanan Ashrawi has warned, "Israel wants a truce without political consequences, while Hamas wants political recognition without concessions. This contradiction makes progress impossible."
Text © ARA en español — archived here with attribution to the source. — Machine translation for archival reference. — Original source